COMMUNITY - FORUMS - GENERAL DISCUSSION
Continuing the Launch Kingdoms Update

A Continuation of the Launch Kingdoms of Elyria Update

Special shoutout to serp for help with the idea behind this thread.

When the Launch Kingdoms of Elyria update came out, I was pretty pleased. Going the extra mile, instead of just recognizing the monarchs behind the kingdoms, they took the time to name the kingdoms and link recruitment threads and discords. In my mind, this was a very positive thing for SBS to do; community interaction creates a mutual symbiosis between both the community and developer. By formalizing and advertising the major communities, SBS has effectively both helped them with recruitment, and bring on a new surge of hype. To the newcomers to CoE, it can be overwhelming at first; a complete information overload. Hopping in and finding a good kingdom to feel at home with definitely helps them ease into the game, as well as become comfortable hanging out with the community. The moderator and ambassador teams can only do so much; but when people are looking for a home or a crew to roll with, the kingdoms provide that.

Due to the positive outcome of that update, I’d like to bring to the attention of SBS the idea of creating a second one when the time comes. After settlement selection is done and tribes are picked, the kingdoms will change significantly. They will begin integrating their lore and ideologies with that of their tribes. The remaining undecided players who were focused on tribe over community will be drawn back in. Creating a second, more in depth update in the fashion of the first would greatly solidify the kingdoms even further. Each tribe has their own unique identity, as does each kingdom. Fusing both of these together will create nations far more distinct than if they remained a one-or-the-other situation, like most people are in now.

For an example on how this connection creates a more potent dynamic, I’ll be basing things off what several NA-W kingdoms plan to be, yet unconfirmed for now.

  • The kingdom of Blackheart, steeped in shadow and blood. The mysterious swamps of the Dras provide a home much like the citizens, provide for their own and offer great challenge to any foreign threat.
  • The kingdom of Aranor, a veritable fortress of a land. Deep in their mountains, the Hrothi toil away as an industrial powerhouse. Below in the forests of the Brudvir, the denizens work together for the greater good of all within.
  • The kingdom of Valyria, a regal region. The Neran are masters of both the land, and the blade. Legions of powerful soldiers arise, as well as the more humble farmers; each equally vital to the prosperity of the realm.
  • The kingdom of Riftwood, a haven of both scholar and soldier. In the hazardous yet bountiful wetlands of the To’resk, a golden age of academia is on the rise. Hidden within the mighty rainforests, the even mightier Janoa reside - hunting both beast, and any Mann unwise enough to cross them.

These were all examples based on my own server, as I am familiar with these kingdoms; both in their ideals presently, and planned tribes. The purpose of this list was not for advertisement or propaganda, but rather to reinforce the message. Tribes bring a fresh new twist on the communities, and the communities in turn breathe life into the tribes they choose.

It'd be great to see even more community interaction from SBS with the kingdoms, getting to know their members and what they stand for. I believe each brings so much more to the table than what the tribes alone can offer. A kingdom of one tribe may be vastly different than that same tribe on another server, simply because of the community it’s attached to.

I’d love to open up a discussion on this, if you have any other thoughts on the matter; feel free to talk about it. The point of this was community interaction, so I’d love to see just that.


10/18/2017 8:38:43 AM #1

I don't think they should do that IMHO, since how can you write it objectively and writing a backdrop of the player created and not Story created kingdoms could conflict with how the story on the ground is actually unfolding.

So they should stick to names, majority tribe and religion and give links; that's it.


10/18/2017 8:49:53 AM #2

I also made a forum post Found Here for the NA- W kingdoms and duchies with some helpful info that I will also be making for the other servers ^.^

So hopefully that helps too! I'm around half way done for the other servers posts (:


10/18/2017 9:25:45 AM #3

Ps. Riftwood hasnt chosen a tribe as it currently stands.


10/18/2017 9:55:45 AM #4

Yorick, I love how much thought you've put into this. Clearly it's something you're passionate about, and it shows.

Just a quick summation of why I thought Kaizen's master list is so positive and useful;

  • It's informative & objective
  • It's easy to read
  • It has all the links in one easy to locate place

In other words, it's simple, it's easy, it's central.

My one qualm is that by expanding the amount of information on each kingdom, you're doing one of two things;

  • Making the list of kingdoms massive, unwieldy and difficult to read, or
  • Giving some info about each kingdom but missing out on lots more

Now, I know I'd rather have more info & flavour, as I can see you would, but surely the individual threads for each kingdom, as we have stickied in all of the domain subforums, are better suited to this, rather than one megathread? For instance, should an APAC player have to scroll down through all of the NA, & EU servers to get down to the ones that are relevant to them?

My counter-suggestion is the following;

One large thread per server domain subforum, posted after domain selection (and potentially even KoE?) listing all of the confirmed kingdoms in that server and providing the following information (not necessarily in this order):

  • The tribe(s) of that kingdom
  • The biome(s) of that kingdom
  • The "tone" and culture of that kingdom (such as the flavour text in your OP, Yorick)
  • A link to their Discord, Wiki page, recruitment thread, and official site (if applicable)
  • A list of their immediate neighbours & a quick summation of the diplomatic relations with those neighbours
  • A list of the domains within that kingdom, at least to the Duchy level, and a link to the recruitment page of those domains

Enacting this, we would have 2 awesome resources; one in Kaizen's original list which is simple and informative, and one that's more in-depth and specialised, providing a feel for the kingdoms as well as listing them. This second post would be more intended for an audience of players who know a lot about CoE already and who are really looking to get to know the kingdoms.

Thoughts?


Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.

10/18/2017 10:06:01 AM #5

Posted By Caelestius at 03:55 AM - Wed Oct 18 2017

Yorick, I love how much thought you've put into this. Clearly it's something you're passionate about, and it shows.

Just a quick summation of why I thought Kaizen's master list is so positive and useful;

  • It's informative & objective
  • It's easy to read
  • It has all the links in one easy to locate place

In other words, it's simple, it's easy, it's central.

My one qualm is that by expanding the amount of information on each kingdom, you're doing one of two things;

  • Making the list of kingdoms massive, unwieldy and difficult to read, or
  • Giving some info about each kingdom but missing out on lots more

Now, I know I'd rather have more info & flavour, as I can see you would, but surely the individual threads for each kingdom, as we have stickied in all of the domain subforums, are better suited to this, rather than one megathread? For instance, should an APAC player have to scroll down through all of the NA, & EU servers to get down to the ones that are relevant to them?

My counter-suggestion is the following;

One large thread per server domain subforum, posted after domain selection (and potentially even KoE?) listing all of the confirmed kingdoms in that server and providing the following information (not necessarily in this order):

  • The tribe(s) of that kingdom
  • The biome(s) of that kingdom
  • The "tone" and culture of that kingdom (such as the flavour text in your OP, Yorick)
  • A link to their Discord, Wiki page, recruitment thread, and official site (if applicable)
  • A list of their immediate neighbours & a quick summation of the diplomatic relations with those neighbours
  • A list of the domains within that kingdom, at least to the Duchy level, and a link to the recruitment page of those domains

Enacting this, we would have 2 awesome resources; one in Kaizen's original list which is simple and informative, and one that's more in-depth and specialised, providing a feel for the kingdoms as well as listing them. This second post would be more intended for an audience of players who know a lot about CoE already and who are really looking to get to know the kingdoms.

Thoughts?

i like the idea of this but it could change at any time and then the kingdoms would want changes to be made and then its up to the op who in this case Yorick is asking be a member of sbs. So I dont think that it should be made like an official post like that. However I wouldnt mind additionally adding that to like my posts at a later date. i just dont think that it would be maintained the way that the kingdoms would want, and could at first reflect positively and then later negatively. its gonna get busy and things are gonna change


10/18/2017 10:58:29 AM #6

100% see where you're coming from, Vi. Do you think it's entirely necessary that the post is made by a member of SbS staff? It adds a certain gravitas, sure, but a post made by the monarch of that kingdom is a bit more dynamic and can be changed easily by them.

That said, when inevitably the player who pledged for that kingdom is no longer monarch of that kingdom, ownership of that post is in question. It's a tricky one. SbS ownership of the post limits the amount that it can reasonably be expected to change, monarch ownership reduces visibility & isn't necessarily future-proof.


Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.

10/18/2017 11:00:57 AM #7

Posted By Caelestius at 04:58 AM - Wed Oct 18 2017

100% see where you're coming from, Vi. Do you think it's entirely necessary that the post is made by a member of SbS staff? It adds a certain gravitas, sure, but a post made by the monarch of that kingdom is a bit more dynamic and can be changed easily by them.

That said, when inevitably the player who pledged for that kingdom is no longer monarch of that kingdom, ownership of that post is in question. It's a tricky one. SbS ownership of the post limits the amount that it can reasonably be expected to change, monarch ownership reduces visibility & isn't necessarily future-proof.

Thats my point exactly. From how I see this op's post is him asking for sbs to make the post and I disagree with that. I dont think they should make the post. It would be a thing for the kingdom monarch to make. Pinning it like the kingdom ones would get that little bit of exposure though. Or even a post from sbs after land selection saying "The Kingdoms have chosen!" and have it incorp the servers, the kingdoms, then the discords and forum links again saying to check out the updated info (which would be made anyways after the land selection) with the maps even? Generalized ones showing the kingdoms locations. still gets the exposure with the kingdoms making the posts.


10/18/2017 11:37:53 AM #8

Of course, if everyone agreed that the monarchs get to make it... Then which monarch gets to make it? If all of the NA-E servers got put into one big thread, who would get to make that thread? Obviously each monarch would author their own kingdom's summary, but there'd be a huge amount of contention over who'd get to actually post it, which is another point on the SbS poster side.


Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.

10/18/2017 11:49:34 AM #9

Posted By Caelestius at 05:37 AM - Wed Oct 18 2017

Of course, if everyone agreed that the monarchs get to make it... Then which monarch gets to make it? If all of the NA-E servers got put into one big thread, who would get to make that thread? Obviously each monarch would author their own kingdom's summary, but there'd be a huge amount of contention over who'd get to actually post it, which is another point on the SbS poster side.

True. And I wouldnt want to force them to use my threads.... Bleh. Its a lot to think over though and brainstorm. Maybe over the next couple days others will also come up with ideas


10/18/2017 3:01:58 PM #10

And he didnt mention Ashland....sigh lol Great post My Dood!


10/18/2017 5:23:24 PM #11

Posted By TheCoz at 09:01 AM - Wed Oct 18 2017

And he didnt mention Ashland....sigh lol Great post My Dood!

My list was made as an example on how tribes interact with kingdom values, not as a promotional list. As I'm not familiar with Ashland's pick, I left them out.


10/18/2017 5:26:40 PM #12

Posted By Caelestius at 03:55 AM - Wed Oct 18 2017

Yorick, I love how much thought you've put into this. Clearly it's something you're passionate about, and it shows.

Just a quick summation of why I thought Kaizen's master list is so positive and useful;

  • It's informative & objective
  • It's easy to read
  • It has all the links in one easy to locate place

In other words, it's simple, it's easy, it's central.

My one qualm is that by expanding the amount of information on each kingdom, you're doing one of two things;

  • Making the list of kingdoms massive, unwieldy and difficult to read, or
  • Giving some info about each kingdom but missing out on lots more

Now, I know I'd rather have more info & flavour, as I can see you would, but surely the individual threads for each kingdom, as we have stickied in all of the domain subforums, are better suited to this, rather than one megathread? For instance, should an APAC player have to scroll down through all of the NA, & EU servers to get down to the ones that are relevant to them?

My counter-suggestion is the following;

One large thread per server domain subforum, posted after domain selection (and potentially even KoE?) listing all of the confirmed kingdoms in that server and providing the following information (not necessarily in this order):

  • The tribe(s) of that kingdom
  • The biome(s) of that kingdom
  • The "tone" and culture of that kingdom (such as the flavour text in your OP, Yorick)
  • A link to their Discord, Wiki page, recruitment thread, and official site (if applicable)
  • A list of their immediate neighbours & a quick summation of the diplomatic relations with those neighbours
  • A list of the domains within that kingdom, at least to the Duchy level, and a link to the recruitment page of those domains

Enacting this, we would have 2 awesome resources; one in Kaizen's original list which is simple and informative, and one that's more in-depth and specialised, providing a feel for the kingdoms as well as listing them. This second post would be more intended for an audience of players who know a lot about CoE already and who are really looking to get to know the kingdoms.

Thoughts?

That's actually a relatively streamlined system, I'd be okay with that personally. This thread was mostly just an open call for even more community engagement, not so much a direct request. However when the time comes, it would be good to update the simple list with the basic tribe info as well, since quite a few players are eyeing up a specific one until then. It'd be good to have a lot of this information easily accessible, so new players can dive as deep as they want without missing out on anything.


10/18/2017 8:59:04 PM #13

Posted By Sauska at 02:25 AM - Wed Oct 18 2017

Ps. Riftwood doesnt want To'Resk/Janoa

maybe some don't.


10/18/2017 9:09:18 PM #14

As of right now, Riftwood isn't claiming any preference on any particular tribe. The reason for this is because we don't know what will be available for us when it comes time for us to choose. It would be foolish for me to say "We are a Kingdom of [blank]" when we honestly don't know what options I'll have available.

I'm not, at this time, locking my Kingdom down to one particular tribe just to get people's hopes up, then have them disappointed we couldn't get said tribe.

I am, however, polling public opinion in the chance one of my Kingdom's top picks are available for me during land selection.

I hope that clears up any misinformation.

EDIT

At one time we had discussed the prospect of Janoa/To'Resk, though due to the constant changes we see regarding land selection, I decided against locking anything down until I know what my options are.


10/18/2017 10:10:41 PM #15

^^ I didnt know how to word it because I was half asleep but I was saying that we havent chosen.