Posted By Ihathis at
So, having now read two different tribe write ups, I noticed what I assume will be a pattern among them that will actually define some of their biggest differences, as far as leadership goes. This is theory crafting.
So, it seems that while a title will generally pass from the current holder to their named heir, in the event that one does not exist, the qualities/conditions on which a casus belli depend on varying cultural conditions. So far we know that these are prestige and wisdom/age for the Neran and Hrothi respectively.
Personally, I think this is a really nice touch. I know I saw someone mention with worry that their heir might not be able to take their title because of these differences in leadership dynamics.
That won't be the case, it seems, with these dynamics coming into play more in the maneuvering side of politics. This brings up interesting questions like 'will it be easier for a wise, old Hrothi duke to gather support to overthrow a young king who has recently come into their title. I would guess yes, but I can't say for sure, obviously. What's everyone else think of this dynamic?
I like it, adds story hooks and flavor. Plus it means the NPCs will have some motive to arbitrarily liking or disliking a famous player. Also adds a layer of intrigue to the typical political BS (read dance).