I'm going to bet most of the current community is older due to access to money for pledges. Also i see a lot of people referencing games such as UO.
I'll be very interested in the results.
I'm going to bet most of the current community is older due to access to money for pledges. Also i see a lot of people referencing games such as UO.
I'll be very interested in the results.
I see two problems with the poll. One is typographical, the other might be considered ageist.
(1) The first option is labeled ">17", meaning "greater than seventeen". I think it should be labeled "<18", because all of the other options are actually greater than age 17, and there actually is no other option for anyone
(2) There should be more options for age brackets for those older than 45. There's a lot of difference between 45 and 70, for example, in terms of life experiences that could be expected to influence tastes and interests.
If you'd like to make the link clickable you just put:
[What you want it to say](LINK)
I agree with Poldano. I think only for people <17 everyone >45 is the same-ish? ;)
"We're all connected;
To eachother, biologically;
To the earth, chemically;
To the rest of the universe, atomically." - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Friendcode: 205FC9
Disappointing to see the eldest group is lumped in as one. 46+. There is a lot of variance with someones' playstyle and time allotment. Half of the group would be still working and then the rest are now enjoying retirement.
I agree about the age on your poll cutting off at 45. I have been playing computer games before there was any video and it was just words scrolling across the screen. By the time UO came out I was already in my upper 30's. And my brother, who is one of my vassals here, was in his 50's. As a old timer I demand some respect. Just because I have to type with my cane is no reason to have me not included in your poll. AARP will be hearing of this poll! LOL.
I speak in jest. I could care less about the age cut off other than it will be less accurate than it could be and you are shooting for accuracy are you not?
Is there no polling site that actually lets people view the results? The polling site you use is rubbish.
I’m 15 years young. And for as long as I can remember, I’ve been able to see ghosts
Posted By Lady ShyHeart at 08:33 AM - Wed Jun 13 2018
I’m 15 years young. And for as long as I can remember, I’ve been able to see ghosts
I get the same effect with certain types of mushrooms.
Posted By Lady ShyHeart at 09:31 AM - Wed Jun 13 2018
I use pseudo
I used to do that, but only as a decongestant. I think it sauteed my brain, if only lightly.
Please.....
There's better things than pseudo over the counter, but my lips are sealed
Posted By SoulSpark at 08:26 AM - Wed Jun 13 2018
Is there no polling site that actually lets people view the results? The polling site you use is rubbish.
it can be uploaded after the fact and actually that site is one of the best available for free. Most sites dont actually show you full data even if they have collected it. Like one site only shows the first hundred. Some sites only allow one question with only two options. The fact is that 40 dollars a month is a lot to be spending if you aren't getting huge amounts of engagement.
6ADB99
