Posted By Xaar at 02:47 AM - Tue May 23 2017
Posted By Llewelyn_Disgyndwr at 12:02 AM - Tue May 23 2017
I felt it wasn't the case, so I got Magistrate AND spent for EP as well. Governor seemed like it was more "Commitment/Scope" than I wanted to deal with initially?
What's the additional commitment needed for Governor above Mayor/Magistrate? Are Magistrates & Governors still just mayors/barons of a single settlement, with the same level of management required?
I'm in a similar position to others here -- debating between mayor+lots of EP, magistrate + some EP, and governor + a little EP. Part of the issue is whether we can use EP to upgrade the magistrates villa to a manor during exposition.
I'm not bothered about A1, and want to avoid spending too much time on administration & land management. So if governor has additional overheads then I'll probably go for one of the lower ones and buy/upgrade a manor house during exposition.
My understanding is that each level adds more time requirements for maintenance, due to size, I.E. a Governor's "town" is more likely to be a city.
The perception I have from statements over time is that it will be the equivalent size to the Count's starting County Seat or the Duke's Capital, just not as deep in Scope to their duties overall.
But certainly more work than running a village as a Mayor. I have nothing to confirm this, and it is my own perception based upon what I have read so take it as you may.
To me everything so far has been logical and each tier granted greater scope in governance, so it just follows?