I'm interested, sounds sort of like an adventurers guild but with a bit more personal freedom, i.e. no ties to one specific kingdom. So count me in please!
I'm interested, sounds sort of like an adventurers guild but with a bit more personal freedom, i.e. no ties to one specific kingdom. So count me in please!
If your interested, the leader of our rangers is an open position in our guild. Right now we are fairly new and open to changes. Any leaders can help transform the guild. If you are interested see the link below in my signature.
Welcome aboard then :)
Glad someone else share my view on being involved with a kingdom. I really want to avoid being tied to a Kingdom,makes a guild more like an Army division than an independent organisation imo.
Yeah it sounds like there's a lot more freedom where you don't have to be a specific character someone else thinks you would suit. Would there be a branch that sees to the economic side of the guild?
The Economic/trader part comes under the Crafting Corps,didn't see much point in having 2 smaller corps when they can fit into one.
Sounds right up my street, not sure where I myself would fit in as I would like to do a bit of everything archery related. However any of the three corps look like a good fit for me, it will probably be a case of see what I enjoy when the game finally gets here.
Ah nice, smart idea and it will integrate well in a Ranger orientated guild! I would also recommend trying to enter the League of Independent Nations and Groups as being a Ranger Guild, information and contacts should be a fairly high priority.
Perhaps,I was thinking about it but the league is more nation based than organisation based. Could join up as peacekeepers,essentially what the Rangers were going to be anyway.
Also we do lose some freedom from joining due to the treaties they might put in place. But I do like the Leagues goal of acting as the UN(well I guess they want to be the in game League of Nations) its a good idea,but not sure if we'll fit in,especially if the league goes evil.
I was basing my toon on the Rangers from the books also. So. Am in sounds good to me. The only part I do not like is the shadow part but I agree that if we need to take down a tyrant we will need people that can be assassins but he rest I am looking to see it in game.
With a side order of contracted assassinations and thefts? How will the Shadow corp fit in with the peacekeeping mantra that the rangers guild will be sticking to? Will they only be hits ordered on 'evil' people? Or will it be available to the public?
The Shadow corps main role will be surveillance. But if there is a tyrant for example then they enter the role as assassins,it won't be an assassin for hire group.Assassinations will only be a last resort against evil people. "Evil end for an evil person" sort of thing.
Oh and the thieving was more of returning stolen items where stealth is an easier way than an attack. Say a bandit steals an important document vital to a kingdom the Shadows would sneak in and take it back,maybe leave a fake behind to trick the bandits. That sort of thing.