Posted By Scorus at 8:00 PM - Sun Aug 25 2019
Would it be possible to not implement the 'no picking a lone town+ by a mayor' until the server is actually down to the number of outstanding count titles? In some biomes you will be closing off a very large number of towns when you may not have that many counts that haven't chosen.
This is going to heavily impact a large number of players so that you do not inconvenience what I expect will be a very few number of players. They number of counts that do not show up during their week but then do come in to pick before the end of D&SS will not be many at all. In areas like Tidal and Salt Marsh, this will mean that whole counties could go unpicked as they are only one town and a hamlet or two!
This keeps coming up, the idea that SBS designed it this way to not inconvenience Count level PCs. People keep forgetting that every County WILL have a count, whether that's a PC or an NPC and being a Count requires the infrastructure of a Town as they have to manage the buying and selling of parcels of land throughout the County. If a Mayor picks the only Town+ settlement left then SBS would then have to alter a smaller settlement to allow for the Count to be able to function (a function that every landowner needs them to have) in EVERY county where this occurs, which given how much everyone wants a Town would basically be every County that wasn't picked during the initial Count selection.
The more SBS has to manually change, the more things start to unravel with the game world. Point and case, this current situation with so many 1 Town+ settlement counties is almost certainly due to the 24 County per Duchy constraint the Community at large pressured SBS into making. The downstream effects of what you are asking for will also have similarly disruptive results down the line. Now it's true that the auction might require a few instances of this manual meddling, but that's a far cry from how much they'd have to do if they followed this suggestion.
Look, I am a Mayor as well. In fact, I got the Governor package to boot and so I can empathize with the frustration of those that didn't realize that having a Mayor tier wasn't a guarantee of a Town or greater settlement. Hells, I would have more grounds to feel entitled to a large town or city given the Governor tier, but I don't, because I looked past the basic description and focused on what the package listed as the actual benefits (what Snipe pointed out in his post). The reality of the situation is that we are ALL getting the ability to control a settlement. The size might vary, but we get one along with a fancy cloak and coat of arms signifying that we are in charge (at least initially).