Vice mayor of Special mention on comparison between Map H vs Map I :
If you guys want more analysis on top of the detailed version, all I can offer is the coastline comparison. As I mentioned in the round 1 analysis, Map H's inland sea have uncertain impact on how naval development will go. Unfortunately, I have no clue which biome best support Reeds Ship building, etc, so I can only stick with wooden boats.
Ignoring that, pulling coastline length data from my previuous analysis : Best biome for ship building : Map H: 85, Map I : 66 Biome supportive for ship building : Map H: 93, Map I : 125
The Alpine forest on both maps is quite unfriendly for coastal settlements. The Taiga though, has a lot of inlets. I am expecting the coasteline with white pixels in the Taiga to be rough and rocky, this leaves both maps having roughly 2/3 of the coastlines suitable for ship building settlement. However, there are more bays in the Taiga for Map I. For K3's naval force, the Mixed Leaf Forest is great for both maps while its coastline in Map H locates within a huge bay. Combining with the fact of possible separate development of naval power I mentioned in the detailed analysis, K3 supporters would support Map I over Map H. For the Salt Marsh, Map H > Map I.
For K5 the Woodland Savanna on Map I comes out on top even its shores are rougher. Cause on Map H, there is not much of a coastline for Woodland Savanna.
If we also consider the Supportive biomes: Lower Montane: Map I wins cause of the sharp penisula at the North East corner. Grassland : Map H wins with a bay Marsh: Tie between the maps Shrub Steppe: Ties, both are rocky as hell where we can't tell will there be multiple coastal settlements Shrublands: Map H wins with the gentler coast with the inland sea and a Bat at its border with the Marsh. Tropical rainforest: Map I wins with the Guld at its Westyern coast. Tropical Wetland : Ties, both have multiple inlets and bays.
I would say Map I comes out slightly on top, unless the inland sea can contribute heavily to the naval technology development. The result is kind of inconsitent with my first analysis because we can now tell how much of a coastline is rough.