Posted By Sir Zyr at 12:01 PM - Fri Aug 03 2018
This is great information! I love it!
On a random note, I imagine if you were a Dras player wanting to expand their home, you would have a boxy house rather than a dome or cone. This is simply because it's almost impossible to expand on a dome without rebuilding it (and I suspect the same of a cone), whereas it's relatively simple to add to a box. Just attach another box to the side.
Agreed, although I would point out that additional domes could be constructed and joint via sheltered paths, however this does limit the possibility of any vertical expension as it could be very difficult to build on top of a dome structure.
Very rarely does building take the shape of a dome in RL especially during old times as it is could be hard to build and the shape does sacrifice usable space in the inside.
There are dome-shaped architecture tho, and they tend to be on two polar extreme given the nature of the dome. Said architecture are usually free standing huts which are small and without the intention for any expansion; as such it would usually be for the purpose of a temporary shelter be it deconstructable or not. In this case the design would be mainly form by function to utilize the structural attributes of a dome.
On the other hand the dome as a geometric shape has also been used as a symbol for official buildings where a sense of authority and luxury is desirable. In this case the approach to utilizing a dome would mostly be for the visual quality and possibility to create large overarching voids. This architectural strategy could be found in historic temples and palaces.
As for the case of CoE I would imagine a division between RP architecture and utilitarian architecture...guess we will re-live the architecture history of Neoclassicism vs Mordernist architecture! Can't wait! Haha!
*edited - typo